In reply to:
Senator Eric Schmitt
@SenEricSchmitt
·
3d
The statement and the conversation it replies to engage in public discourse by addressing international censorship and its impact on American sovereignty and free speech. The tone is assertive and critical, focusing on the perceived threat of foreign influence on American public discourse.
- The statement aims to protect free speech, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but could be seen as potentially inflammatory towards European governments, which may not fully respect the dignity of others. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather criticizes policies, aligning with constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for policy changes, aiming for societal betterment by protecting free speech. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by advocating against censorship. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.