Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement and accompanying letter express concerns about perceived censorship by European governments and its impact on American sovereignty and free speech. The tone is assertive and critical, calling for action from the U.S. government to counter these influences.
- The statement aims to protect free speech, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words and actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy but uses strong language that could be seen as inflammatory, potentially bordering on disrespect. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in criticism of European policies but does not engage in personal attacks, adhering to constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for policy changes, aiming to protect free speech, which aligns with societal betterment. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by advocating against censorship, aligning with responsible use of the platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.