Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement is highly critical and accusatory, labeling Candace Owens as a liar and anti-Semite, and comparing her to Louis Farrakhan. It accuses her of spreading harmful conspiracy theories. The tone is confrontational and dismissive, lacking constructive dialogue.
- The statement violates the principle of doing no harm by using harsh language and making serious accusations without constructive engagement. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of others, engaging in personal attacks and potentially defamatory language. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement fails to promote understanding or empathy, instead fostering division and hostility. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It does not engage in constructive criticism, opting for personal attacks rather than reasoned debate. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.