In reply to:
Secretary Marco Rubio
@SecRubio
·
2d
The statement is a supportive reply to a tweet by a public figure discussing international censorship and American viewpoints, which constitutes public discourse as it engages with a public issue related to free speech and international relations.
- The statement does not cause harm and is supportive, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, as it does not engage in harassment or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not actively promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, but it is not negative either.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement supports a public figure's stance, which could be seen as using influence for societal betterment, depending on one's perspective on the issue. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by supporting a stance against censorship, aligning with the principle. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.