Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement addresses a public issue concerning international influence on American platforms and censorship, indicating a strong stance against perceived external control over American viewpoints. It reflects a defensive tone, suggesting protective measures by the Trump Administration against what is described as 'egregious acts of extraterritorial censorship.'
- The statement does not directly harm with words but uses strong language that could be seen as confrontational.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does imply a negative view of European ideologues.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue; it presents a one-sided view without inviting discussion or understanding. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to assert a nationalistic stance, which may be seen as beneficial by some but divisive by others.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by opposing censorship, but the tone may not fully align with responsible and integrative discourse.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.