Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement and accompanying content discuss the actions and criticisms of HateAid, an organization involved in monitoring and reporting illegal online content. It highlights the organization's dissatisfaction with the Digital Services Act (DSA) and mentions sanctions imposed by the US government on HateAid's leaders. The tone is critical, focusing on the perceived inadequacies of current regulations and the organization's role in content moderation.
- The statement aims to highlight issues with content moderation and legal frameworks, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by advocating for better regulation. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity by focusing on organizational actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism of the DSA and platforms' responses to reported content, without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to discuss societal issues related to online content regulation, aiming to influence public opinion and policy. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.