Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement critiques a '60 Minutes' feature for its lack of critical engagement with the issue of free speech, particularly in the context of a German police raid over a cartoon. It suggests a bias in the reporting by highlighting the absence of pro-speech perspectives. The conversation further involves a critique of Bari Weiss's qualifications to comment on journalism, suggesting her insights are less valid than those of '60 Minutes' journalists.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies a critique of journalistic practices, which could indirectly harm reputations.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech but questions the integrity of the '60 Minutes' feature.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on critiquing the lack of diverse perspectives in the feature. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of the '60 Minutes' feature and Bari Weiss, but it borders on personal attack by questioning Weiss's qualifications. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech by critiquing the lack of diverse perspectives in the '60 Minutes' feature, but it could be more balanced in its critique. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.