Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement is a public discourse as it engages with public issues related to freedom, censorship, and international sanctions. It addresses government officials and suggests policy actions, thus contributing to civic dialogue.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words or actions, but the call for sanctions could indirectly harm the targeted organization.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does call for punitive measures against a specific organization, which could be seen as a form of public pressure. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on punitive measures rather than dialogue or resolution. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it calls for sanctions without offering a platform for discussion or understanding. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to advocate for policy actions, but it is debatable whether this is for the betterment of society, as it involves punitive measures.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by addressing censorship issues, but the call for sanctions could be seen as contradictory to promoting open dialogue.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.