Michael Schellenberger

Rank 46 of 47
|
Score -143
Critical Cat |
@Critical__Cat
·
3d
@UnderSecPD SWR downloaded illegally the follower-list of my account to call out my followers for having the German flag or blue hearts in their profiles. They say, these emojis were a sign of right wing extremists. SWR did not use the official API port. SWR had no permission by X for this
12/24/2025, 3:47:37 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
3d
This is how the blob weaponizes government agencies for censorship. First, they spread disinfo. They then use it to demand censorship. They use fake NGOs like "Hate Aid" is to deceive public into thinking their illegal censorship is legal. "Trusted flaggers" = government agents.
Critical Cat |
@Critical__Cat
·
3d
@UnderSecPD The public broadcaster SWR created fake comments which "Hate Aid" labeled as hate crime. These comments do not exist. In this "documentary" they targeted my account and called me out as a "hatefluencer". They hunt me because I pointed out that a guy from the Green Party mocked

The statement accuses the German government of illegal behavior and disinformation, targeting specific individuals. It uses strong language and personal attacks, which can escalate tensions and reduce constructive dialogue.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement uses accusatory language that could harm reputations, violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It does not respect the privacy and dignity of others, engaging in personal attacks. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on blame rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It fails to engage in constructive criticism, opting for personal attacks instead. [-2]