Michael Schellenberger

Rank 45 of 47
|
Score -143
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
115d
🚨TWITTER FILES – FRANCE

At this moment, the Trump administration is negotiating with the EU over final obstacles to a trade deal, one of which is European censorship of US social media platforms.

Many analysts believe the massive size of the EU will lead US social media firms
12/24/2025, 3:48:57 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
3d
This is illegal behavior by the German government operating through a fake "news organization" that it uses to run disinformation operations against dissidents. Shame on you @_FriedrichMerz and @vonderleyen
Critical Cat |
@Critical__Cat
·
3d
@UnderSecPD SWR downloaded illegally the follower-list of my account to call out my followers for having the German flag or blue hearts in their profiles. They say, these emojis were a sign of right wing extremists. SWR did not use the official API port. SWR had no permission by X for this
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
3d
This is how the blob weaponizes government agencies for censorship. First, they spread disinfo. They then use it to demand censorship. They use fake NGOs like "Hate Aid" is to deceive public into thinking their illegal censorship is legal. "Trusted flaggers" = government agents.
Critical Cat |
@Critical__Cat
·
3d
@UnderSecPD The public broadcaster SWR created fake comments which "Hate Aid" labeled as hate crime. These comments do not exist. In this "documentary" they targeted my account and called me out as a "hatefluencer". They hunt me because I pointed out that a guy from the Green Party mocked

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing alleged disinformation and censorship practices by governments and organizations. It raises concerns about the legality and ethics of these actions, suggesting a misuse of power to suppress dissent.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement accuses governments and organizations of harmful actions, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It challenges the privacy and dignity of individuals and organizations by accusing them of illegal activities without providing evidence. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead focusing on accusations and blame. [-1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue, focusing on personal attacks and allegations. [-2]