Michael Schellenberger

The statement is part of a broader discussion on government and organizational influence over social media censorship, particularly focusing on allegations of disinformation and censorship operations. It suggests that the Stanford Internet Observatory, under the supervision of a former U.S. ambassador, was involved in a censorship operation for the Department of Homeland Security, which allegedly led to the censorship of a Harvard Medical Professor. The tone is accusatory and critical of perceived government overreach and manipulation.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement could potentially cause harm by spreading unverified claims about censorship and disinformation operations, which might contribute to public distrust. [-1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It challenges the privacy and dignity of individuals and organizations by making specific allegations without providing evidence, potentially leading to harassment or reputational damage. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on accusations and criticism without fostering constructive dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism but lacks constructive dialogue or evidence to support its claims, which could be seen as a personal attack on the individuals and organizations mentioned. [-1]