Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement and conversation focus on the activities of the Global Disinformation Index and its impact on political speech, which is a matter of public concern. The tone suggests a critical stance towards the GDI, implying it censors political speech. The call to share the report widely indicates an intent to raise awareness and possibly influence public opinion.
- The statement could potentially harm reputations by implying censorship without providing evidence in this excerpt. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The call to share the report widely suggests an intent to promote understanding, but the critical tone may not foster empathy or compassion.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but criticizes an organization, which can be seen as constructive if evidence is provided. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to raise awareness about an issue, which can be seen as positive if the information is accurate and fair. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.