Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement criticizes the use of tax money for censorship and calls for sanctions, framing it as a threat to freedom of speech in Europe. It suggests that those in power are aware of policy failures, implying a need for accountability.
- The statement aims to protect freedom of speech, aligning with the principle of doing no harm with words. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but the call for sanctions could be seen as aggressive.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding of perceived threats to freedom of speech, aligning with promoting empathy and compassion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement criticizes policies and actions without personal attacks, aligning with constructive criticism. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.