Michael Schellenberger

Rank 42 of 47
|
Score -109

The statement discusses the challenges of intervening in Venezuela's political and economic situation, highlighting concerns about corruption and potential negative impacts on the U.S. and a specific presidency. It presents a pessimistic view on the feasibility of aiding Venezuela.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement could be seen as dismissive of efforts to help Venezuela, potentially lacking empathy for the country's situation. [-1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or compassion, as it focuses on the negative aspects and potential risks without considering constructive solutions. [-1]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement does not engage in constructive dialogue, as it presents a one-sided view without exploring alternative perspectives or solutions. [-1]