Michael Schellenberger

Rank 41 of 47

Score -109

The United States will “run” Venezuela until a “safe, proper and judicious transition” can be ensured, says President Donald Trump. Venezuela’s new president, Delcy Rodriguez, is “essentially willing to do what we think is necessary to make Venezuela great again,” he said.

But

1/4/2026, 9:46:10 PM

In reply to:

Michael Shellenberger

@shellenberger

20d

It's honorable to want to help Venezuela, but it can't be helped. Its oil-fueled corruption is endemic. We don't need its oil and trying to rebuild its industry would require a dangerous level of intervention that would harm the US and destroy the @realDonaldTrump presidency.

The statement and images engage in public discourse about U.S. foreign policy towards Venezuela. The statement by President Trump suggests a direct intervention in Venezuela's governance, which raises issues of sovereignty and international relations. The reply and accompanying image argue against U.S. intervention, citing the risks and potential harm to both countries.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement by Trump could be seen as potentially harmful by suggesting intervention in another country's governance, which may not respect Venezuela's sovereignty. [-2]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The reply promotes understanding by highlighting the complexities and risks of intervention, encouraging a more cautious approach. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The discourse engages in constructive criticism of U.S. policy, avoiding personal attacks and focusing on policy implications. [+1]
Principle 6:
I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
The reply uses its platform to argue for a policy that considers long-term consequences and respects international norms. [+1]