Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
Robby Starbuck
@robbystarbuck
·
20d
The statement critiques the prolonged military presence in Iraq post-Saddam Hussein's capture, suggesting that detaining a leader is insufficient for conflict resolution. It implies that the extended conflict led to unnecessary casualties and criticizes political decisions for prioritizing prolonged engagements over swift resolutions.
- The statement implies harm was done by political decisions, but it does not directly use harmful language.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding of the consequences of prolonged military engagements, fostering empathy for soldiers. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement criticizes political decisions but does not engage in personal attacks against specific individuals. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to critique military and political strategies, aiming for societal betterment by advocating for more responsible decision-making. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech responsibly by engaging in a critique of public policy. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.