Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement highlights a public issue concerning U.S. foreign policy and economic interests in Venezuela, specifically regarding oil production. It suggests that economic motives, rather than purely humanitarian or political ones, may drive interventionist policies. The tone is critical and aims to expose underlying motives, potentially sparking debate about the ethics and implications of such policies.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as critical of U.S. policy motives, which may provoke strong reactions.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not explicitly promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it focuses on exposing motives rather than fostering dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of policy motives but does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- By exposing potential motives behind policy decisions, the statement could contribute to public awareness and debate, potentially influencing societal views on foreign policy. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by critically analyzing and discussing public policy motives, using the platform to question and inform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.