Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
689d
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
15d
The statement is a strong critique of politicians who support or remain silent on medical practices related to transgender youth, implying future regret for their actions or inactions. It uses charged language like 'medical barbarism' and 'complicity,' indicating a highly critical stance.
- The statement uses emotionally charged language that could be seen as harmful, potentially inciting fear or anger rather than constructive dialogue. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of those involved, particularly by tagging public figures in a potentially accusatory manner. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it frames the issue in a highly negative light without acknowledging the complexity of the topic. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, instead opting for a confrontational tone. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.