In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
15d
The statement is accusatory and inflammatory, suggesting that specific politicians are responsible for policies that allegedly harm families. It uses strong language to criticize gender-affirming care policies and implies a negative future impact if certain politicians gain more power.
- The statement uses charged language that could contribute to harm by inciting fear and misunderstanding about gender-affirming care. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not respect the dignity of those involved, particularly the politicians and individuals who support gender-affirming care. [-2]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding for the complexities of transgender issues and the intentions behind the policies. [-2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- It engages in personal attacks rather than constructive dialogue, focusing on vilifying individuals rather than discussing the policy itself. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.