Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement involves a journalist questioning a public official about a specific incident involving ICE officers. This is part of public discourse as it addresses government actions and accountability. The tone is direct and seeks clarification.
- The statement strives to clarify facts, which aligns with doing no harm by ensuring accurate information is shared. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- By questioning the official, the statement promotes understanding and transparency, aligning with promoting empathy and compassion through informed discourse. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the official's account without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.