Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement and linked content involve a discussion on a significant public issue, namely the ICE shooting in Minneapolis. It highlights a debate between a public official and a journalist, which is a part of civic dialogue.
- The statement itself does not directly cause harm, but the topic discussed involves a serious incident that requires careful handling to avoid misinformation.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The discussion respects privacy and dignity by focusing on public figures and their statements rather than private individuals. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by linking to a full interview, allowing for a comprehensive view of the discussion. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The interaction between Tapper and Noem suggests an engagement in constructive criticism and dialogue, as Tapper challenges Noem's description of the event. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.