Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement criticizes ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement) and the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) for their actions and communication, particularly in relation to an incident involving tear gas and an infant. The tone is critical and accusatory, highlighting perceived recklessness and miscommunication by these agencies.
- The statement accuses ICE of recklessness and violence, suggesting a violation of the principle to do no harm. However, the statement itself does not use harmful language.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others by not naming individuals involved in the incident, focusing instead on the actions of ICE and DHS. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement aims to promote understanding by highlighting a perceived injustice, though it does so in a critical manner rather than a compassionate one.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism of ICE and DHS, but it does not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments, focusing on actions and policies instead. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses its platform to bring attention to a societal issue, potentially contributing to public awareness and discourse on the actions of ICE and DHS. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement exercises free speech to criticize government actions, using the platform responsibly to address public concerns. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.