Jake Tapper

Rank 8 of 47
|
Score 110

The statement involves a public figure using a platform to promote a conspiracy theory about Israelis setting fires in Argentina to create a new Jewish homeland. This claim is presented without evidence and is countered by available facts. The conversation includes accusations of antisemitism and a defensive response questioning why the truth is considered antisemitic.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement potentially causes harm by spreading unfounded conspiracy theories that can incite fear and prejudice. [-2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It disrespects the dignity of others by promoting a narrative that can be seen as antisemitic. [-2]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, instead it spreads misinformation. [-2]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The response to criticism is defensive and does not engage constructively with the concerns raised. [-1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    Using a platform to spread conspiracy theories does not contribute to the betterment of society. [-2]