In reply to:
daledwayer
@daledwayer
·
20d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
20d
The statement criticizes the actions of ICE agents, suggesting they are acting outside the law and are being used by the President to suppress laws. It engages in public discourse by addressing the role and actions of a government agency, which is a significant public issue.
- The statement uses strong language that could be seen as harmful by labeling ICE agents as 'law violators' and a 'paramilitary force.' This could be considered a violation of the principle to do no harm. [-2]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does make a broad accusation against a group of individuals, which could be seen as disrespectful to their dignity. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses accusatory language without offering a constructive dialogue or solution. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it makes a sweeping accusation without addressing specific actions or policies. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a manner that could be seen as lacking responsibility and integrity due to its accusatory tone. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.