Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47
|
Score 55
1/20/2026, 12:43:20 AM
X
In reply to:
Dudley Badanov
@DudleyBadanov
·
19d
@marwilliamson @daledwayer You do realize that you're losing it, right? You're not making any sense at all. Calm and contemplative has been replaced by shrill and irrational.
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
19d
@daledwayer Are you under the impression that the behavior of ICE agents right now is legislated by law? It is not. They are not law enforcers; they are law violators. They are a paramilitary force being used by the President to suppress our laws! Congress legislated the money for ICE, that
daledwayer
@daledwayer
·
19d
@marwilliamson You have never explained why the government should not enforce federal law. What is the point of the laws if they are not enforced?
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
20d
They will go down in history as complicit cowards if they do not stop this.
Bill Kristol
@BillKristol
·
21d
Congress can stop ICE. Congress can block the use of force in Greenland. In other words, in this crisis, Congress can act to support civil liberties at home and free nations abroad. To fail to act would be to be complicit in a dreadful outcome.

The statement is part of a broader public discourse on the role and actions of ICE agents, government enforcement of laws, and the moral responsibility to address suffering and cruelty. The tone is assertive and challenges the notion that calmness equates to inaction in the face of injustice.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by advocating against cruelty and violence, aligning with the principle. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    It promotes understanding and empathy by emphasizing the moral duty to address suffering, aligning with the principle. [+2]
  3. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The statement engages in constructive dialogue by countering the idea that calmness means inaction, without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle. [+1]
  4. Principle 7:
    I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
    The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using the platform to discuss societal issues, aligning with the principle. [+1]