Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅
The statement critiques a hypothetical scenario involving a 79-year-old American president threatening war against a NATO ally over not receiving a Nobel Peace Prize. It suggests that objections to such behavior might be dismissed as 'Trump Derangement Syndrome.' The tone is critical and somewhat sarcastic, aiming to highlight perceived absurdity in political discourse.
- The statement does not directly harm others but uses a hypothetical scenario to critique political behavior.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech, but it does use a term that could be seen as dismissive of certain political views.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it uses sarcasm to make a point. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it uses a hypothetical scenario to mock a political stance. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech but does so in a way that may not be seen as responsible or constructive. [-1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.