Jake Tapper

Rank 5 of 47

Score 185

Reposted by Jake Tapper 🦅

-1

My opposition sees antisemitism not as a tragedy but as a strategy.

One of my opponents appears in a despicably antisemitic video with Erik Warsaw, who once lionized Nick Fuentes—a notorious Holocaust denier—as a “hero.” In that video, my opponent demonizes the Jewish residents

1/21/2026, 1:08:21 AM

The statement accuses an opponent of using antisemitism strategically and associates them with a video featuring antisemitic content. It aims to highlight and criticize the opponent's alleged actions and associations.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement aims to expose harmful behavior, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by calling out antisemitism. [+1]
Principle 2:
I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
It respects the privacy of individuals but could be seen as engaging in a form of public shaming, which may border on harassment. [-1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding of antisemitism as a serious issue, but its accusatory tone may not foster empathy or compassion.
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in criticism of an opponent, which is constructive if based on factual evidence, but the tone is accusatory and could be seen as a personal attack. [-1]