In reply to:
Phil
@Nobodieknows
·
13d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
13d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing the controversial topic of ICE and its presence in Minneapolis. It expresses a belief in a potential change driven by public action.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but could be seen as confrontational.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding and empathy by acknowledging the other person's point of view and expressing hope for change. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement avoids personal attacks and maintains a focus on the issue at hand. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.