In reply to:
🫃🏼💉🇺🇦🇸🇴Hollaria Briden, Esq.
@HollyBriden
·
12d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
12d
The statement is part of a public discourse on immigration enforcement and the role of ICE. It questions the validity of claims about ICE's actions, seeking evidence to support or refute the assertion that ICE is arresting individuals who are not criminals. The tone is skeptical and challenges the previous statement's implication.
- The statement seeks evidence, which can contribute to informed discussion, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by promoting truth. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not engage in harassment or hate speech, maintaining respect for privacy and dignity. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement challenges another's claim, which can be seen as constructive criticism, but it could be more empathetic in tone.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.