Marianne Williamson

The statement engages in public discourse by discussing immigration policies and their impacts. It uses a rhetorical question to criticize past actions and policies, comparing them to more extreme historical events. The tone is confrontational and aims to provoke thought about the severity of past actions.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement uses a provocative comparison that could be seen as harmful or inflammatory, potentially violating the principle of doing no harm. [-2]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   The statement does not engage in direct harassment but uses strong language that could be seen as disrespectful. [-1]
3. Principle 3:

   I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.

   The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it focuses on criticism rather than constructive dialogue. [-1]
4. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and could be seen as an ad hominem attack by comparing policies to extreme historical events. [-2]