In reply to:
🫃🏼💉🇺🇦🇸🇴Hollaria Briden, Esq.
@HollyBriden
·
12d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
12d
The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the role and actions of ICE agents, a topic of societal and political debate. The tone is accusatory and challenges the perceived role of ICE in public safety.
- The statement could be seen as harmful by accusing ICE agents of perpetrating violence, which may not contribute to a constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the dignity of ICE agents, potentially engaging in a form of verbal attack. [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement lacks empathy and understanding, focusing on accusation rather than dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism and instead makes a broad accusation without evidence. [-1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.