In reply to:
Ruben Kellermann
@RubenKellermann
·
7d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
7d
The statement engages in a discussion about public policies and societal issues, specifically addressing the impact of government actions and mandates on personal freedoms and public safety. The tone is defensive, aiming to clarify a position on the severity of certain policies compared to others.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm with words or actions, as it focuses on clarifying a position rather than attacking individuals. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects the privacy and dignity of others, as it does not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech. [+1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement attempts to promote understanding by differentiating between levels of coercion and fear, though it could be more empathetic in acknowledging the concerns of those affected by the policies.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive dialogue by addressing the points raised in the conversation without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.