Marianne Williamson

Rank 16 of 47

Score 55

@EsnardGlen Fraud absolutely exists. But you go after it with forensic accountants, regulators and prosecutors. Not armed masked agents in the street. How would ICE agents on the street even know where it is and what they should do about it? Violent criminal undocumented people also exist

1/29/2026, 5:40:59 PM

In reply to:

Glen Esnard

@EsnardGlen

@marwilliamson @marwilliamson Does fraud not exist, with federal dollars? Do violent criminal aliens not exist? Some jurisdictions cooperate with fed law enforcement. Some don’t. The chaos seems to only occur in those jurisdictions that don’t cooperate. All blue. They bring it on themselves.

Marianne Williamson

@marwilliamson

The PR has changed from “going after the violent criminals” to “going after the fraud” - as though armed agents in military gear rather than forensic accountants and prosecutors in business suits are the way to go after fraud.

But neither is their actual goal.

Their goal is the

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the issue of how fraud and violent crime should be handled by law enforcement, particularly in the context of immigration enforcement and federal jurisdiction. It critiques the use of armed agents for addressing fraud, suggesting a more appropriate approach involving forensic accountants and legal professionals. The statement also touches on the existence of violent criminal undocumented individuals, implying a need for a nuanced approach to law enforcement.

Principle 1:
I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
The statement strives to do no harm by advocating for non-violent methods of addressing fraud, aligning with the principle. [+1]
Principle 3:
I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
The statement promotes understanding by suggesting a more appropriate method for handling fraud, which could foster empathy and compassion for those affected by aggressive law enforcement tactics. [+1]
Principle 4:
I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
The statement engages in constructive criticism of current law enforcement practices without resorting to personal attacks, aligning with the principle. [+1]
Principle 7:
I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.
The statement upholds free speech by responsibly critiquing law enforcement practices and suggesting alternatives, aligning with the principle. [+1]