In reply to:
Dahlias_garden
@dahlia_defiant
·
7d
Marianne Williamson
@marwilliamson
·
7d
The statement engages in a public discourse about the use of armed agents in addressing fraud, a societal issue related to law enforcement and public policy. The tone is critical and questions the effectiveness of such measures.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but questions the effectiveness of a policy, which is a neutral stance.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion, as it is more focused on criticism without offering constructive alternatives. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in criticism but does not attack individuals personally, adhering to the principle of constructive dialogue. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses free speech to question public policy, which is responsible use of a platform. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.