In reply to:
Pascal Clérotte
@McmahonPascal
·
8d
The statement engages in public discourse by discussing legal and political issues related to proposed changes in Spanish law and the concept of 'weaponizing justice.' It critiques the legality of actions under EU law and the Spanish constitution, and references a specific event in Paris.
- The statement raises concerns about legality and justice, which can be seen as striving to do no harm by questioning potentially harmful actions. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It does not engage in cyberbullying or hate speech, but it does imply wrongdoing by authorities, which could be seen as disrespectful if not substantiated.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement could promote understanding by highlighting legal concerns, but it lacks detailed explanation or evidence.Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement critiques actions and policies but does not engage in personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.