Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement calls for a review and audit of communications between the U.S. and French officials regarding disinformation and platform governance, in response to a claim about French police actions against social networks. It engages with public issues related to international relations, freedom of speech, and government oversight of social media platforms.
- The statement does not directly cause harm but implies suspicion and potential wrongdoing, which could indirectly harm reputations without evidence. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy by not disclosing specific private information but suggests a lack of trust in the involved parties.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy; it is accusatory and lacks a constructive approach. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but does not foster constructive dialogue either.Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to call for accountability, which could be seen as an attempt to better society, but it lacks a balanced perspective.Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by questioning government actions but could be more responsible by providing evidence or context.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.