Reposted by Michael Shellenberger
The statement is a critical response to perceived ongoing influence and control by certain operatives within the US government, particularly in relation to censorship and international policy. It expresses frustration and concern over the allocation of funds and the involvement of specific individuals in shaping these policies.
- The statement uses strong language, which may not align with the principle of striving to do no harm with words. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not respect the privacy and dignity of individuals by accusing them of being part of a 'censorship industrial complex.' [-1]Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement does not promote understanding or empathy, as it is accusatory and lacks constructive dialogue. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in personal attacks rather than constructive criticism, violating the principle of engaging in dialogue without ad hominem arguments. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.