The statement is a call to action regarding a public policy issue, specifically the funding and existence of ICE, which is a component of the Department of Homeland Security. The tone is assertive and suggests a strong stance against ICE, advocating for its abolition.
- The statement does not directly harm others with words, but the call for abolition could be seen as dismissive of the roles of individuals working within ICE. [-1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement does not promote understanding, empathy, or compassion towards those who may have differing views or those working within ICE. [-1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in constructive criticism or dialogue, as it presents a unilateral position without inviting discussion or considering opposing viewpoints. [-2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement exercises free speech and uses the platform to express a political opinion, but it could be more responsible by fostering dialogue rather than a one-sided call to action.Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.