Reposted by Rashida Tlaib
The statement addresses a significant public issue related to human rights and the right of return for Palestinian refugees. It involves a resignation from a prominent human rights organization due to a disagreement over the handling of a report, indicating a substantive engagement with public concerns.
- The statement does not appear to cause harm directly but highlights a disagreement over a principled issue.Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement respects privacy and dignity, focusing on organizational actions rather than personal attacks.Principle 2:I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
- The statement promotes understanding by bringing attention to a blocked report on a significant human rights issue. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement does not engage in personal attacks but rather critiques organizational decisions. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement uses influence to highlight a public issue, potentially contributing to societal betterment by advocating for transparency and accountability. [+1]Principle 6:I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
- The statement upholds free speech by responsibly using the platform to discuss a public issue. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.