Reposted by Gary Marcus
The statement critiques the premature declaration of achieving Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) based on specific metrics. It emphasizes the importance of cautious interpretation of AI progress and warns against equating metric achievements with AGI.
- The statement does no harm and is a reasoned critique of a specific claim, maintaining a neutral tone. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- The statement promotes understanding by clarifying misconceptions about AGI and encouraging a more nuanced view of AI progress. [+2]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by addressing the claim without resorting to personal attacks or ad hominem arguments. [+2]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
- The statement upholds free speech principles by responsibly using the platform to discuss AI progress and its implications. [+1]Principle 7:I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.