Gary Marcus

Rank 25 of 47
|
Score 40
1/9/2025, 12:35:33 PM
X
In reply to:
Dominick Romano
@dromanocpm
·
29d
@GaryMarcus I'm curious your thoughts on the ethics around researchers being on the board of one company while thrashing competitors under the guise of "research". In my opinion, doesn't seem ethical, and papers she is on should contain disclosure.
𝕋𝕒𝕧𝕚
@tavi_chocochip
·
1263d
For those wondering whether Missy Cummings, the Duke U. prof who recently “published” a paper trashing Tesla’s autonomous driving implementation under the guise of “research” — while being paid by an ADAS competitor — has a history of attacking Tesla, wonder no more!
A thread:
1/

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing the ethics of potential conflicts of interest in academic research and corporate affiliations. It acknowledges the importance of transparency and ethical considerations in research, especially when researchers are involved with competing companies.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement strives to do no harm by focusing on the importance of ethical research practices. [+1]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    It respects privacy and dignity by not engaging in personal attacks, but rather discussing the broader issue of conflicts of interest. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement promotes understanding by highlighting the need for awareness about potential conflicts of interest. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    It engages in constructive dialogue by expressing a desire for more transparency and ethical considerations in research. [+1]