The statement questions the tendency of some in the AI field to make exaggerated claims, suggesting that such behavior could harm the field if these claims are proven wrong. It advocates for a more realistic approach to avoid setbacks like an 'AI winter' while still promoting progress.
- The statement aligns with the principle of striving to do no harm by cautioning against hyperbolic claims that could damage the field. [+1]Principle 1:I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
- It promotes understanding and empathy by encouraging realistic discourse in AI, which can foster trust and progress. [+1]Principle 3:I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
- The statement engages in constructive criticism by questioning the approach of making exaggerated claims without resorting to personal attacks. [+1]Principle 4:I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.