Michael Schellenberger

The statement engages in public discourse by addressing concerns about the judiciary's role in political matters, suggesting it has become a tool for political purposes. It criticizes actions like arresting people for opinions, censoring critics, and spying on citizens, arguing these are intolerable in a democracy.

1. Principle 1:

   I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.

   The statement aims to highlight potential harm caused by political misuse of the judiciary, aligning with the principle of striving to do no harm. [+1]
2. Principle 2:

   I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.

   It respects privacy and dignity by focusing on systemic issues rather than personal attacks, though it criticizes specific actions of public figures. [+1]
3. Principle 4:

   I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.

   The statement engages in criticism of the judiciary's actions, which could be seen as constructive if it leads to dialogue and reform, but it risks being perceived as an attack if not balanced with constructive suggestions. [-1]
4. Principle 6:

   I will use my influence for the betterment of society.

   By raising awareness of potential misuse of power, the statement uses its influence to advocate for democratic principles. [+1]
5. Principle 7:

   I will uphold the principles of free speech and use my platform responsibly and with integrity.

   The statement upholds free speech by criticizing censorship and advocating for democratic tolerance of diverse opinions. [+1]