Michael Schellenberger

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -102
12/4/2025, 6:51:18 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
17d
@theblackvault @DeptofWar It's great to see the most influential online UAP skeptics on board with government transparency.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
17d
@theblackvault @DeptofWar This level of censorship is absurd and cannot be justified as necessary for national security. Indeed, nobody has even tried to justify it.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
17d
@theblackvault It could be one of them. The reason I think it's not is because it's an internal @DeptofWar document, which would raise the question of why they couldn't rule out US tech. But I agree it could be given the level of compartmentalization.
FromDeathToLife
@optionski
·
17d
@shellenberger "..the slide censors two of the three potential explanations for UAPs." Why isn't Advanced US Technology one of the 2 censored?
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
17d
Thank you, @theblackvault for your work over the last 30 years petitioning the government to reveal more of the things it is unnecessarily and illegally keeping secret. You don't get enough credit.
John Greenewald, Jr.
@theblackvault
·
17d
I fully support and advocate for removing the redactions on the below documents I got through FOIA. And there are many more just like it.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
17d
Take a close look at this document. Everything you need to know about UAPs (UFOs) you can learn from it. It's a slide from a presentation by the Pentagon's UAP Task Force.

You might wonder what we can learn from a document that is so heavily censored, or redacted. That's exactly
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
17d
Marco Rubio says he has no "way to verify” the “spectacular claims” made by “people with high clearances.” But if the Nat. Sec. Advisor lacks access to classified intel, and cannot tell if officials are lying, then it's up to Trump to reveal what the government knows about UAP.

The statement and conversation revolve around government transparency regarding Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UAP) and the release of related documents. It engages in public discourse by addressing issues of government secrecy, national security, and public access to information.

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement promotes transparency and accountability, aligning with the principle of doing no harm by advocating for public access to information. [+2]
  2. Principle 2:
    I will respect the privacy and dignity of others and will not engage in cyberbullying, harassment, or hate speech.
    There is respect for privacy and dignity, as the discussion focuses on government actions rather than personal attacks. [+1]
  3. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    The statement encourages understanding and empathy by advocating for open access to information that could clarify public concerns about UAPs. [+1]
  4. Principle 4:
    I will engage in constructive criticism and dialogue with those in disagreement and will not engage in personal attacks or ad hominem arguments.
    The dialogue is constructive, focusing on the issue of transparency rather than engaging in personal attacks. [+1]
  5. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement uses influence to advocate for societal betterment by pushing for government transparency. [+2]