Michael Schellenberger

Rank 44 of 47
|
Score -102
John Greenewald, Jr.
@theblackvault
·
16d
@shellenberger @DeptofWar It would even actually behoove them to NOT redact it, if that was one of the ones blacked out.

Speculating here, but the U.S. government has LONG maintained that UFOs were secret aviation programs, and classified spy programs, etc. of their own design.

To have a PPT that
12/4/2025, 6:51:36 PM
X
In reply to:
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
16d
@theblackvault @DeptofWar Government UAP/UFO Documents:

https://www.theblackvault.com/do…
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
16d
@theblackvault @DeptofWar It's great to see the most influential online UAP skeptics on board with government transparency.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
16d
@theblackvault @DeptofWar This level of censorship is absurd and cannot be justified as necessary for national security. Indeed, nobody has even tried to justify it.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
16d
@theblackvault It could be one of them. The reason I think it's not is because it's an internal @DeptofWar document, which would raise the question of why they couldn't rule out US tech. But I agree it could be given the level of compartmentalization.
FromDeathToLife
@optionski
·
17d
@shellenberger "..the slide censors two of the three potential explanations for UAPs." Why isn't Advanced US Technology one of the 2 censored?
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
17d
Thank you, @theblackvault for your work over the last 30 years petitioning the government to reveal more of the things it is unnecessarily and illegally keeping secret. You don't get enough credit.
John Greenewald, Jr.
@theblackvault
·
17d
I fully support and advocate for removing the redactions on the below documents I got through FOIA. And there are many more just like it.
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
17d
Take a close look at this document. Everything you need to know about UAPs (UFOs) you can learn from it. It's a slide from a presentation by the Pentagon's UAP Task Force.

You might wonder what we can learn from a document that is so heavily censored, or redacted. That's exactly
Michael Shellenberger
@shellenberger
·
17d
Marco Rubio says he has no "way to verify” the “spectacular claims” made by “people with high clearances.” But if the Nat. Sec. Advisor lacks access to classified intel, and cannot tell if officials are lying, then it's up to Trump to reveal what the government knows about UAP.

The statement 'Fascinating' is a brief expression of interest in the ongoing discussion about government transparency regarding UAP/UFO documents. The conversation involves public discourse on government disclosure and transparency, particularly concerning unidentified aerial phenomena (UAPs) and the Freedom of Information Act (FOIA).

  1. Principle 1:
    I will strive to do no harm with my words and actions.
    The statement does no harm and simply expresses interest, aligning with the principle of doing no harm. [+1]
  2. Principle 3:
    I will use my words and actions to promote understanding, empathy, and compassion.
    By engaging in a conversation about government transparency, the statement indirectly promotes understanding and awareness of public issues. [+1]
  3. Principle 6:
    I will use my influence for the betterment of society.
    The statement supports the betterment of society by encouraging transparency and accountability in government actions. [+1]